Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a score of 81.1 against 76.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is notably newer than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it's heavier and thicker. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.