Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a overall score of 81.1 against 77.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a much newer phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it is incredibly heavier and a lot thicker. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a way larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 84 percent bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.