Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having an 81.1 score against 79.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola One Hyper, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
The Motorola One Hyper and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro feature really similar displays, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixel number in each screen inch. Motorola One Hyper features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features superior battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper. They have the same camera aperture, the same video resolution, a same resolution camera in the back and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.