Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 global score. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better battery life than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 7% bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.