Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Nokia |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than Nokia 9 PureView, getting a general score of 81.1 against 76.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Nokia 9 PureView. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better display density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor and a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 51 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.