Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's global score of 76. Even being the best device in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an older, somewhat heavier and thicker device than the OPPO Find X3 Neo. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because it has a 12% larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.