Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a overall score of 82.1 against 81.1. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but it is a bit lighter.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a better display density and a little bigger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures better videos and photos than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a battery performance that's just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery lifetime, although the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.