Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 score. Although it's the best in this review, it must be noted that it is also a way older, a bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel quantity in each inch in the display. Galaxy A15 5G counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's battery duration is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, although the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a 0% smaller battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot better video quality.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A15 5G. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.