Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G, getting an 81.1 score against 76.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version. Although it's the best device we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is thicker and a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A16 5G.
Galaxy A16 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a bit lower display pixels density and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, they both have a display with the same size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better performing processor than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM.
Galaxy A16 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, although the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs more than the Galaxy A16 5G, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.