Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A20s, having an 81.1 score against 77. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Galaxy A20s has Android 11. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a heavier and thicker device than Galaxy A20s.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a bit bigger display and a better pixel density. Galaxy A20s features as much storage capacity for applications and games as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, they have equal internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better resolution back camera, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way larger sensor taking much better quality photos and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.