Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A22's overall score of 76.1. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is older, just a little bit thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A22.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A22, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a much better (4K) video quality. Galaxy A22 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A22 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.