Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 score. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a just a little lighter device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but they have the same thickness. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A22 5G counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures better photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images in low-light environments, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery duration in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although the Galaxy A22 5G has a 0 percent lower battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.