Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A30's 79.6 score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is newer than the Galaxy A30's, although it is thicker and much heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a display that's very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A30 has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a way higher video quality.
Galaxy A30's memory to install applications and games is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 26 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.