Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with an 82 score against 81.1. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only design is newer, incredibly lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a quite better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a much bigger sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 LTE Only's battery lifetime is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, although the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.