Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-05 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, getting a score of 82.9 against 81.1. Galaxy A34 is a lighter and much thinner device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A34 has a more recent 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10.
The Galaxy A34 counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A34 also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A34 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A34, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a larger sensor capturing higher quality photographs.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A34's battery life is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery duration, although the Samsung Galaxy A34 has a 0 percent smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.