Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, with an 81.1 score against 79.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design weights the same than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it's just a little thicker. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a quite worse pixel density, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and the Galaxy A35 5G feature incredibly similar batteries performance, although the Galaxy A35 5G has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.