Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but it's thinner and notably lighter anyway. Galaxy A50 features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel number in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has improved battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5020mAh battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back, a much better (4K) video resolution and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.