Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 score. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is just a bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although they were released only 0 months apart. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality, a bigger aperture and a back camera with lot more MP.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G costs more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.