Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a general score of 90.7 against 81.1. The Galaxy A52 is a newer device, and it's also a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A52 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A52. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Galaxy A52 has a camera that is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's camera, and although the Galaxy A52 has a bigger aperture, they both have a same size camera sensor, the same video resolution, a back-facing camera with a 64 MP and the same video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.