Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it's also a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A52 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a camera that's just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same (4K) video quality, a back-facing camera with a 64 mega pixels resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same camera sensor size.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.