Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having a overall score of 91.1 against 81.1. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52s has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A52s is a newer phone, and it is also just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
Galaxy A52s counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A52s has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a bit higher pixel amount per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 12% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A52s's camera is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a larger aperture, they both have the same video frame rates, a same size back camera sensor, the same resolution back facing camera and the same video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.