Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a newer cellphone than Galaxy A70, although it is thicker and heavier. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A70. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A70 both feature really similar displays, both of them have a higher pixels count per screen inch, a display with the same size and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.