Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with an 87.5 score against 81.1. Galaxy A71 is a lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, even when they were released only a couple months apart. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version.
Galaxy A71 counts with a screen that is very similar to the display in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, they have a same size display, a better amount of pixels per display inch and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, a same resolution camera in the back, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A71 costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.