Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Prism bricks black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, getting a overall score of 92.9 against 81.1. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should give all the same operating system features. Even when the Galaxy A71 5G UW and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro were released only a couple months apart, the Galaxy A71 5G UW is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of them have a screen of the same size, the same number of pixels in each inch of display and an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a same size sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger aperture.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 12% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.