Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-05 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy C5's 76.4 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a notably newer cellphone than Galaxy C5, although it's thicker and notably heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version and Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy C5 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro feature extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy C5 has a much smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a way higher resolution camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 93% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.