Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Blue and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, getting a score of 81.1 against 78.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is incredibly newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and the Galaxy C7 Pro both count with incredibly similar displays, although the Galaxy C7 Pro has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a little bit smaller screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much better resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.