Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a global score of 84.6 against 81.1. The Galaxy F23 design is newer, incredibly lighter and just a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F23 has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy F23 has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2408. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F23, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM. The Galaxy F23 features a battery life that is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, although the Galaxy F23 has just 5000mAh battery size instead of 5020mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.