Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 global score. Although the Galaxy F62 is newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, it's just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
Galaxy F62 features a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, a same size display and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater number of cores.
Galaxy F62 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy F62, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have a same size camera sensor, a 64 megapixels resolution camera, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.