Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Max, with an 81.1 score against 76.1. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is extremely newer than the Galaxy J7 Max, it is just a little bit thicker and heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Galaxy J7 Max feature quite similar screens, although the Galaxy J7 Max has a quite smaller display, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.