Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a general score of 87.7 against 81.1. Both phones we are comparing have the same Android 10 operating system. Although it's the best phone we compare here, it must be noted that it's also just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy M51 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro both feature very similar displays, and although the Samsung Galaxy M51 has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit less pixels per display inch, they both have a same size screen.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy M51, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a 64 MP back camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs.
Galaxy M51 features a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a 39 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.