Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a general score of 81.2 against 81.1. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is noticeably older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, it's design is just a bit thinner and lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit smaller display and a bit worse pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of 2300 megahertz cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 57 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.