Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's overall score of 80.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is much newer, but somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a way bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.