Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a score of 86.2 against 81.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a a little bit thinner and a little lighter device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, even when both of them were released only 3 months apart. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of them have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the same number of pixels per inch in the display and a screen of the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a superior memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.