Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 global score. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a just a bit better quantity of pixels per screen inch, a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of 2.3 gigahertz cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 57 percent greater battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and video, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.