Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note4's 77.6 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is way newer than Samsung Galaxy Note4's, but it's heavier and just a bit thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note4 has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels number in each inch of screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography, a way larger back camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.