Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note7, with a global score of 81.1 against 79.5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is a lot newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note7. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixel density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.