Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-05-05 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy On7 Prime, having a score of 81.1 against 76.9. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is incredibly newer than Galaxy On7 Prime's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a camera in the back with a way better 64 megapixels resolution, a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a really longer battery life than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.