Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 overall score. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy S20 FE design is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a just a little better count of pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.