Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, with a overall score of 81.1 against 76. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a somewhat thicker but just a little lighter device than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.
Galaxy S24 FE features a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a bit inferior pixels quantity per screen inch, they both have a display of the same size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.