Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having a general score of 90.7 against 81.1. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you some extra features. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely thinner and extremely lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much faster CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, a greater count of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photos and videos, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a battery life that's just as good as the battery duration in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a 0 percent lower battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.