Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
U.S. CellularSM-G925R4
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 85.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2015-04-10 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.59 x 2.76 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 4.66 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminium and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Edge has a general score of 85.7, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's overall score of 81.1. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 Edge has an older 5.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10. Even though Galaxy S6 Edge is noticeably older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, it's construction is way lighter and somewhat thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge has an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels amount in each screen inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S6 Edge features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S6 Edge also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge, because it has a 93% larger battery size.
Galaxy S6 Edge not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.