Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is noticeably newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is also somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and more RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.