Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only 1 months apart, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro count with similar memory to install applications and games, both have equal internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a way larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.