Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's score of 81.1. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 body is newer, lighter and extremely thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a little bit better count of pixels per display inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.