Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black Shadow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's score of 81.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a incredibly thinner but heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184px and a larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 64 MP resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.