Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-05 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 overall score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact. These phones include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit more memory to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a much more megapixels back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 75% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.