Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the Sony Xperia XZs, with a global score of 81.1 against 77.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is notably newer than the Sony Xperia XZs's, although it is just a bit thicker and a lot heavier. The Xperia XZs counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little higher pixel density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little faster processor than Xperia XZs, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a camera in the back with much less MP resolution, a way tinier sensor, a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a smaller aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a bargain compared to others, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.