Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Blue, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi A3's global score of 79.2. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is newer, but a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Mi A3.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a better screen pixels density, a little bit larger screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4030mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.