Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, getting an 88.9 score against 81.1. Even being the best we compare here, it must be noted that it is also a somewhat thicker and heavier device. These devices use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should count with the same operating system features.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit lower pixels number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 2088 x 2250px. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a much tinier camera sensor, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos and a back camera with much less mega pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.