Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | ZTE |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro's global score of 80.2. Both of these devices have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should provide identical operating system features. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is newer than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it is heavier and thicker.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better screen density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has longer battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 26% bigger battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.